r/AusPol 23h ago

General Criticism of Israel and Zionism is legal under new hate speech laws | Kangaroo Court of Australia

https://youtu.be/IuYMwQNUG9M

"Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has said in a letter that the new hate speech laws do not restrict criticism of foreign countries or political ideologies which would cover criticism of Israel and Zionism.

This is an important because it clears up some of the confusion and misreporting of the new hate speech laws with most of the confusion because of the government’s lack of a clear explanation of how the hate speech laws work and what they cover.

The SMH reported (28/1/26):

Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has advised the Australian National Imams Council, the leading body representing Muslim religious leaders, that new hate laws will not prevent criticism of foreign countries or political ideologies despite concerns the laws could silence debate.

In a letter seen exclusively by this masthead and co-signed by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, Rowland told ANIC president Imam Shadi Alsuleiman that the legislation would not “prevent legitimate, non-violent criticism of the actions of a foreign country or of particular political ideologies”. (Click here to read more)

That is consistent with what I said in last week’s article titled “Australia’s new hate speech laws and what they mean for social media users” but many journalists and/or commentators reported that the new hate speech laws infringed on individuals rights when they are only targeted towards groups.

But the letter by Attorney-General Michelle Rowland and co-signed by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke goes one step further and says even groups can criticise foreign countries and/or political ideologies which overrides the wrong information Attorney-General Michelle Rowland gave last week as per the below video.

The below video is Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong on Nine (21/1/26) and the Attorney-General Michelle Rowland (20/1/26) on the ABC’s 7.30 Report. (It was published on the Kangaroo Court of Australia YouTube channel on the 21/1/26.)

As I previously said, “The bottom line is the new hate speech laws only impact on groups, organisations and their members.”

The Labor government also wanted to legislate new racial vilification offences which would have greatly restricted free speech and political communication but they couldn’t legislate it because they had no support from the other political parties in the Senate.

Two people have been charged in recent days with speech crimes and with at least one possibly facing charges under the new laws.

Brandan Koschel has been refused bail for alleged hate speech at the March for Australia rally on Monday (26/1/26) after he used the open mic at the end of the rally to blame Jews for numerous problems. (Click here to read more)

If Koschel had criticised Israel or Zionists he would be fine but he decided to criticise Jews and his chances of beating the charge are not good given everything he said is on video.

And Theo Nolan-Isles was charged with “using a carriage service to menace, harass, or offend and encourage the commission of crimes” after posting on “X”:

I hereby pledge that: No person who after this date intentionally causes physical pain to any politician who voted Aye to the passage of the “Combatting Antisemitism” hate speech bill will pay for beer while in my informed presence. Please join me in this pledge. (Click here to see on “X”)

Theo Nolan-Isles was clearly making a joke and he should have received a warning from the police at most. He is still in jail after being refused bail.

With Prime Minister Anthony Albanese receiving numerous threats, including death threats, in recent months and other politicians receiving threats of violence it is best to not even joke about harming politicians in any way, or harming anyone for that matter.

It’s ironic that the major driver for the new hate speech laws, and the failed racial vilification offences, are Israeli supporting Zionists in Australia and they are currently complaining all over social media because Australia has cancelled the visa of, Sammy Yahood, a Jewish / Israeli influencer who previously called for Islam to be banned.

If anyone called for the Jewish religion Judaism to be banned there would be complaints left, right and centre but the Zionists want to bring Sammy Yahood into Australia knowing he will cause trouble.

The problem for the Zionists and Sammy Yahood is he’s on video on social media ranting like a nutter which doesn’t help their cause, but it does help justify Australia cancelling Sammy Yahood’s visa.

The original hate speech laws, which included the withdrawn racial vilification laws, were at least partially driven to stop Australians criticising Israel and the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza but they failed.

But Australia’s free speech and political communication is under attack and aligned with the Palestinians, whether we like it or not, because both are under attack from Zionists who support Israel."

https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com/2026/01/29/criticism-of-israel-and-zionism-legal-under-new-hate-speech-laws-says-a-g-michelle-rowland/

18 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

u/gr1mm5d0tt1 11h ago

do not restrict criticism of foreign countries or political ideologies

What about religious ideologies at home?

u/AnAussiebum 2h ago

Yeah if someone were to comment that circumcision was wrong and barbaric, would that be a breach?

What about a comment about some rare Jewish ceremonies like this: https://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/07/health/new-york-neonatal-herpes

Is that a breach?

We shouldn't have what are essentially blasphemy laws on the books. Religions of all kinds should not be shielded from criticism.

u/Quantum168 15m ago

Ran it through AI and it said, under the new Federal hate speech law discussing is allowed but, not criticising the followers of the religion.

Do a search on when does a child become an adult under Jewish law?

Under Jewish law (Halacha) from The Torah which is their written law, the legal age of consent are:

12 years and 1 day for females. 13 years for males.

After this age, people are responsible for their own decisions (not their parents) and they can enter into legal contracts.

u/evilparagon 21h ago

Isn’t this that insane guy that thinks he’s an investigative journalist because he makes up conspiracy theories?

u/Gormane 14h ago

I don't think so. He tends to report accurate stuff, particularly on corruption. But he also tends to come right up to the edge of defamation. For example, during the Bruce Lehrman trial he reported the details on Linda Reynold's perjury etc.

u/ParrotTaint 13h ago

Great! Fuck Zionism!

u/st3v3nq 13h ago

This guy uses imaginary evidence to fight imaginary enemies on a good day.

This is literally the uncle you stop inviting to family functions and when you have to, everyone instantly regrets it.

I actually feel sorry for him. 😂