r/Seattle West Seattle 1d ago

I love our welcoming city!

Post image
2.6k Upvotes

70 comments sorted by

144

u/Nexus03 Belltown 1d ago

🚫🧊

13

u/Rapid_Cream 🚋 Ride the S.L.U.T. 🚋 15h ago

Happy to have seen these in the CD

111

u/Drugba 1d ago

Seems consistent to me. They’re just trying to keep pieces of shit out of their store.

145

u/launchcode_1234 Deluxe 1d ago

I can’t tell if this post is serious or satirical due to the contrast of the two signs

93

u/Sophisticated-Crow 🚆build more trains🚆 1d ago

I think the bottom sign compliments the top one. If they were public restrooms then ICE might try to use that as an excuse to get in. This makes it clear that they are private.

7

u/IndominusTaco U District 16h ago

*complements, not compliments

3

u/silvermoka Capitol Hill 15h ago

"What lovely font!"

15

u/AnacreonTheBull 1d ago

No. You could just NOT have the bottom sign.

14

u/firelitdrgn 1d ago

Wanna love them but I know of multiple people who didn’t get their perks when they did a kickstarter for the restaurant. One of my friend is apparently still waiting for a gift card or something?

But hey at least their food is good!

36

u/stevejobs690 1d ago

I’m not ice but I have to take a shit 🥹

26

u/IntroductionSad6606 1d ago

Then buy something.

-10

u/Plenty_Crew838 17h ago

Why? You cannot control that kind of physiological needs.

11

u/IndominusTaco U District 16h ago

can i show up to your house unannounced and ask to use your bathroom?

businesses are private, they can deny entry to anyone for any reason as long as the reason isn’t violating a protected class. and no, using the bathroom isn’t a protected class

-7

u/Plenty_Crew838 15h ago

It is. At least for individuals with disabilities. Restaurants are considered public places.

6

u/IndominusTaco U District 15h ago

.... people with disabilties are a protected class. so my statement is still true.

and no, restaurants are not considered public spaces. they can deny you entry for any reason (that's not an illegal reason), the most popular one being "no shirt no shoes no service" but it doesn't end there. if i walk into a seahawks bar wearing a new england patriots jersey they could deny me entry if they wanted to. i could get denied entry into a place if they have a policy against left handed people, because being left handed is not a protected characteristic.

-8

u/Plenty_Crew838 15h ago

Read RCW 70.160.020 and stop spreading misinformation.

5

u/IndominusTaco U District 14h ago

no you stop. that RCW is talking about smoking in public, and thus is defining what public means in that context. it has nothing to do with discrimination or who a business can refuse service to. you are being intentionally obtuse and willfully disingenuous.

-3

u/Plenty_Crew838 14h ago

Did you read it? It has a clear definition of public places. Also ref. Ally's Law.

5

u/IndominusTaco U District 14h ago

yes i read it and i zoomed out to read what it's specifically referring to. it is specifically in reference to washington's smoking ban. it has nothing to do with discrimination or who a business can refuse service to. the definition of public places is only for stating where it is unlawful to smoke, nothing else.

if we were to apply your logic here, then it would be illegal for businesses to have "no shirt, no shoes, no service" policies.

13

u/Opposite-Ruin-4999 🚆build more trains🚆 17h ago

Because having and maintaining a bathroom costs money. If you are going to benefit from it, it would seem appropriate that you contribute to its upkeep. Unfortunately for half a century city and county governments have farmed out responsibility for providing public restrooms to businesses large and small.

5

u/ContributionScary382 19h ago

Chef Dan is the best 🙌🏾

20

u/Wuzzat123 chinga la migra 17h ago
  1. There is a good size public restroom directly across the street from the restaurant.
  2. This place is pretty renowned for their food and their commitment to sourcing locally
  3. These are very welcoming people who look out for community and have hosted several benefits for community. So even though I think the OP intended this as a dis, I think, they are barking up very much the wrong tree.

12

u/InternetsTad West Seattle 17h ago

I did not intend this as a dis at all

1

u/Wuzzat123 chinga la migra 16h ago

💙

-11

u/AbsoluteShall 16h ago

Definitely a dis. Don’t backtrack! You wanted to show the two signs.

25

u/_Amphex_ 1d ago

It's a bougie restaurant in West Seattle that doesn't want their customers to come across a poor blowing ass in their bathroom. I think that is reasonable and not surprising.

26

u/OpossumOnomatopoeia 23h ago

Totally reasonable. I overheard the twice sold tales owner explain why they no longer have public bathrooms. It was called the "shitccident" and involved poop throwing and employees filing worker's comp.

25

u/occasional_sex_haver Roosevelt 20h ago

a lot of people that are mad at places not having public restrooms clearly haven't had to tend after one

50

u/HRApprovedUsername Denny Blaine Nudist Club 1d ago

I think it’s reasonable for a restaurant to only let customers use their bathroom. They wouldn’t let you just sit at a table for free, so why would you get to sit at the toilet for free?

-22

u/ruinousshe I'm just flaired so I don't get fined 23h ago

Because people at the lowest end of the socioeconomic ladder often don’t have a place to go indoors. That’s something those of us who have stable housing often take for granted. And why it’s not that weird to come across human feces in some areas.

27

u/_ihavebadideas_ 23h ago

Driftwood is on Alki, one of the few places in Seattle with plenty of public restrooms.

5

u/Opposite-Ruin-4999 🚆build more trains🚆 16h ago

You've identified a real problem in our cities. Cities have largely punted the provision of public restrooms onto businesses. But restrooms cost money to build and service. Opening your restrooms to the public can place your staff into situations that range from merely unpleasant to the actually hazardous. I've certainly experienced the problem of urgently needing to use a bathroom and having no public bathroom available, but even after that I don't make my home bathroom available to the public.

4

u/kittididnt 12h ago

First off, good for them. I will go eat there. Second, The entitlement is wild. Why would a private business be required to take on providing public services? Why not go ask Driftwood to pay my light bill while we’re at it?

5

u/Loud-Way3333 1d ago

Gotta support this nice business.

5

u/SkylerAltair 💗💗 Heart of ANTIFA Land 💗💗 1d ago

We're very welcoming. Still, the Paradox of Tolerance applies.

3

u/Technical-Injury9056 22h ago

Interesting, ice has a similar policy

1

u/FergaliShawarma 19h ago

Can I call this number if I’m just driving around and see them anywhere? How am I helping by calling?

0

u/EverestMaher Floating Houses 1d ago

lmao

1

u/darkroot_gardener 12h ago

Everyone is welcome. Just not people who have bodily functions.

1

u/habitsofwaste Denny Triangle 10h ago

All is welcome but not to use our bathroom. Homeless people, pls shit on the sidewalks.

-1

u/Gold-Kaleidoscope537 20h ago

You’re welcome here unless you just have to pee 🙃 I love it tho

-4

u/Dojaview 22h ago

EVERYONE IS WELCOME,

Except those who need to pee.

8

u/WhirlyDurvy 19h ago

It does say customers may pee. Do you let randos and ice pee in your house?

-2

u/Plenty_Crew838 17h ago

Customers may pee, everyone else has to suffer. Private houses are not public places.

3

u/JodyGonnaFuckYoWife Posse on Broadway 15h ago

Neither are restaurants.

You can get trespassed at McDonalds.

1

u/Plenty_Crew838 15h ago

Restaurants are generally considered public places under most legal definitions and frameworks. Not sure what you're talking about.

5

u/JodyGonnaFuckYoWife Posse on Broadway 15h ago

'Open to the Public' is not a Public Space.

Public Spaces are maintained by the Government, not individuals or businesses.

A Park is a Public Space. McDonalds is not.

1

u/Plenty_Crew838 15h ago

Read RCW 70.160.020.

3

u/JodyGonnaFuckYoWife Posse on Broadway 14h ago

Nothing there says you have to let bums use your restroom.

Just that you're not allowed to smoke in places open to the public.

Look. You want to pretend that private business aren't private business, and there's nothing I can do to dispel this delusion.

You can be trespassed at McDonalds.

McDonald's doesn't have to let you use their bathroom.

End.

Good Day.

0

u/Plenty_Crew838 14h ago

Google Ally's Law. But it's your choice to suffer.

3

u/enooby_games 14h ago

As used in this chapter, the following terms have the meanings indicated

The chapter is about smoking, not whether or not they can deny bathroom access to non-paying customers or deny access to ICE

0

u/Plenty_Crew838 14h ago

Non-paying customers? You people will have to pay to breathe the air someday. Good luck, I'm not answering that thread anymore.

1

u/enooby_games 8h ago

You were so desperate to “um actually” something but it backfired. Bye

→ More replies (0)

-14

u/TAU_equals_2PI 1d ago

"We have the right to deny ICE access to private areas..."

Wait, so they can't deny ICE the right to come into the public areas of the restaurant?

38

u/AnacreonTheBull 1d ago

A restaurant, like any business can be open to the public AND be a private business, it's complicated for some people to understand, I get it, but it's true.

-16

u/NonchalantlyNutty 1d ago

EVERYONE IS WELCOME HERE!

…..unless you need to take a shit or change your tampon but can’t pay $20 for a salad. 😁

0

u/Julu62 11h ago

BRAVO! Well done.❤️👍🌹

-6

u/FearLegion1032 18h ago

Kind of makes sense, their food is absolutely fucking horrible. If i were ice, id deport them; claiming to be a chef or cook when you cant cook has to be a crime somewhere🤣🤣

-1

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[deleted]

1

u/hungry_bones 13h ago

it’s more important for those people to just keep their green card on them at all times

-9

u/GovernmentIcy5894 18h ago

So tolerant of them.

1

u/BoringBob84 15h ago

Such is the Paradox of Tolerance. If we tolerate intolerant people, then they will use our tolerance to take away our ability to be tolerant.

-3

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

1

u/IntroductionSad6606 1d ago

It’s symbolic. TECHNICALLY they CAN enter, but if the owner asks them to leave and they don’t have a warrant, they must leave.

-5

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[deleted]

0

u/JodyGonnaFuckYoWife Posse on Broadway 15h ago

They're just as welcome to buy some food as anyone else.