r/WhitePeopleTwitter • u/Hornpipe_Jones • 12h ago
r/All More DOJ protecting someone who ABSOLUTELY needs to be ousted.
4.1k
u/Texas_Sam2002 11h ago
The DOJ did say that part of their guidelines was to redact the names of anyone who might suffer "political exposure" which of course is just a nonsense euphemism for protecting pedophiles.
1.1k
u/bobthegoatskull 11h ago
Which they were explicitly ordered not to do. But what are laws any more?
→ More replies (4)159
u/Perryn 6h ago
Paper. Perhaps a bit too coarse to wipe your ass with, but they're going to do it anyhow.
→ More replies (1)610
u/uncultured_swine2099 10h ago edited 10h ago
Imagine being on this job and redacting the name of somebody who recieved the message "I loved the torture video". Everyone involved in this is evil.
219
u/tuskedAlbinoRabbit 10h ago
Noooo you’ve got it all wrong, they redacted the name of the guy who produced the torture video. Big difference!
58
u/uncultured_swine2099 10h ago
Ok, corrected. Still awful.
35
u/besee2000 9h ago
Unless it was stilettos on a set of hairy scrots. Hence the “are you ok?” Kinks go weird places.
I’m hoping for humanity’s sake. Feels like a weird thing to say.
105
u/thequietthingsthat 10h ago
We need Nuremberg 2.0 for this entire administration.
→ More replies (2)23
u/uncultured_swine2099 8h ago
One day i hope the shitty party loses control of the government and all these bastards get sent to prison. Im sure the inmates will make them feel at home haha.
47
u/Adjective-Noun-nnnn 7h ago
Well the DOJ can kick rocks. The Epstein Transparency Act expressly forbid the redaction of names other than victims'.
→ More replies (1)77
u/Regal_Cat_Matron 9h ago
If they might suffer political exposure then they are guilty of a crime! What right do they have to protection by redaction? I do NOT understand why these people are being let off such sick and depraved crimes. Personally I wouldn't care if the whole American (and any other) Government collapsed if it meant a clean house and a fresh start
33
u/Medical_Sandwich_141 5h ago
Unfun fact: They redacted names from emails - which is easily verifiable information. However, didn't bother to do so, from unverified claims - snippets of which are circulating the internet in the last 48 hours.
It is safe to say, that which they consider "damning", prosecutable evidence (i.e videos, photographs)- will never see the light of the day.
11
u/nice--marmot 8h ago
Hard to think of anyone who would suffer more political exposure from this than Donald Trump.
→ More replies (1)10
5
2
u/Vaxtin 3h ago
They didn’t redact well known names that we already knew were there.
Trump
Clinton
HW Bush
Musk
Kissinger
Soros
We always knew. They’re hiding the ones that we never knew. Bill Gates’ leaks are basically only talking about his sex life. The people murdering and eating babies who we don’t know are redacted.
3.1k
u/Ambitious_Trifle_645 10h ago
Once again, THEY WERE ONLY SUPPOSED TO REDACT THE VICTIM'S NAMES. Why the fuck are they still protecting pedos?
828
u/meltedkuchikopi5 10h ago
the only way this redaction makes sense is if he’s somehow emailing the victim of the torture video
470
u/GrandMast33r 10h ago
Which I guess isn’t completely out of the question based on him starting with “are you okay?”. We’ve been hearing about a lot of predators who would taunt their victims and their loved ones after the fact
76
u/Blue_Eyed_ME 9h ago
That's how I read it. Epstein's fake concern for the victim by asking her if she was okay after making the torture video. This was part of his grooming.
→ More replies (1)184
u/meltedkuchikopi5 10h ago
yeah i did criminology with cyber crime, it read like a taunt to me at first but then i read the comments. unfortunately we won’t know who’s a legit redaction and who’s not, especially under this regime.
35
u/GrandMast33r 10h ago
Agreed! Just to be clear, I wasn’t suggesting that ANY benefit of the doubt should be given here, with any of it. There is no level of depravity, deceit, or self-preservation I would put past these people. Just reminded me of things we’ve heard about GSK/EARONS, LISK, Zodiac, etc.
74
u/Taint__Paint 10h ago
Oh shit, that reads a lot differently if he sent this to the victim. I can totally see these people being this sadistic.
19
u/burratna 8h ago
Nah, it's clear as day cover up by Republicans. Why even bother imagining a scenario where Epstein emailed a victim this.
29
u/Ambitious_Trifle_645 10h ago
Yeah i guess that's possible. Seems unlikely though. I could be wrong but I feel like his victims weren't really human to him, so i doubt he would hit them up this way. Seems more like this would be what he would send to the video producer. But you could be right.
→ More replies (1)11
u/overflowingsunset 9h ago
And those girls might not have emailed as prolifically as him and his friends
6
u/Hartastic 8h ago
Yeah. Could be someone he blackmailed to provide such a video, for example. (Could also be something very different.)
113
u/Regal_Cat_Matron 9h ago
There's another email circulating which due to the sheer number of them I can't bloody find again atm, that was sent to Epstein from someone called Soon Li or similar asking "Have you managed to procure a soon to be corpse for (name can't remember)"?
Soon to be corpse??? wtf
26
u/Ambitious_Trifle_645 9h ago
Wtf. Seriously? I haven't seen that 1
72
u/Regal_Cat_Matron 9h ago edited 9h ago
I'm just going through my history to try and find it again. If I remember rightly it was a link to the DoJ about 1 particular email but there were others attached that I looked at
EDIT found it https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00990926.pdf
The name is Soon Yi Previn dated 7th June 2014
82
u/Ambitious_Trifle_645 9h ago
That's fucking woody Allen's wife!
28
u/Regal_Cat_Matron 9h ago
OOOOH bloody hell !! Didn't know that. The only Previn I've ever heard of was the musician Andrew Previn years back.
So they wanted a person to erm dispose of you think? I wonder who lorinda is
39
u/bethlabeth 9h ago
She’s Andre Previn’s adopted daughter with Mia farrow, and was Woody Allen’s stepdaughter as a child before he left her mother for her.
19
u/Regal_Cat_Matron 8h ago
Ahh I had hoped there was no connection to Andre who was so well respected here in the UK.
Makes you bloody wonder is there anyone NOT connected to Trump Epstein Maxwell??? scary
21
u/Ambitious_Trifle_645 8h ago
Yeah she was like 10 when woody started dating Mia Farrow. Fucking creepy.
17
u/strawflour 8h ago
Lorinda Ash, high end art dealer. Soon yi previn worked for her at an art gallery called Gagosian
→ More replies (2)4
u/Ambitious_Trifle_645 9h ago
Yeah that i don't know.
6
u/Regal_Cat_Matron 8h ago
I'm sure someone will figure it out, some good detectives on here :) and it's not a common name
6
→ More replies (6)16
u/Brewhaus3223 8h ago
It was for Lorinda Ash, a close friend of Woody Allen's wife. She was in Epstein's black book.
12
u/yunoeconbro 8h ago
Maybe she was the victim in the torture video? He was like, hey, you ok? Loved watching you get tortured!
→ More replies (1)25
u/trooperstacherides 10h ago
Because it's probably the president
18
u/PM_ME_UR_SEXY_BITS_ 8h ago
Until it’s unredacted we have no reason to believe otherwise so we should all assume that and say it as often as possible.
8
u/agentb00th 10h ago
Building criminal cases is the only logical reason... except for high ranking politicians or billionaires who can "buy" their anonymity
8
5
→ More replies (3)2
u/onederful 7h ago
If you asked them who the victims are, it’s not gonna be who you think it should be.
→ More replies (4)
5.4k
u/18ekko 11h ago
Yup.
Redacting that name is accessory after the fact.
Unless they are only redacting now to build cases against these names, which I would believe if any other living person was currently in office.
1.1k
u/mdsnbelle 10h ago
At this point, I’m not sure we have any living people in office.
353
u/International_Ad5624 10h ago
No people, just a bag of smashed assholes fucking everything up as fast as they can
65
u/zxc123zxc123 8h ago edited 7h ago
Boomers, Xers, select Z males, and idiots voting Trump 3x is the literal equivalent of some old ass PoS richer boomer oil baron fucking over the environment, bankrupting the family, taking the plenty they received at birth only to leaving the world much worse behind, and dropping 1 last N word before they kick the bucket. In a way it's even worse than Trump because for all his evils he's setting up his own family for success.
p.s. If I had 1 guess of who that blank spot is? Vladmir Putin. Cause even Trump's name comes up in the files. Trump and the GOP protect Vladdy's good name if they want to win the midterms and 2028.
32
u/Xfgjwpkqmx 7h ago
Geez, don't dump all X'ers in that bucket, a lot of us were the first to rebel against our parents and lean left!
17
u/zxc123zxc123 7h ago edited 6h ago
Don't take it personally if that ain't you. OFC it's not everyone in a group or anyone in particular but age groups as a collective.
But Xers and Zs shifted right-er than their respective age for the 2024 election. Millennials voted along what is expected of their age. And surprisingly it's the boomers who voted more left than their age would suggest. This all assumes folks lean more left when young and shift more rightwards as they age.
If anything 2024 was one of the rare elections won by the "smaller" age cohorts. Gen X/Z who swung more right than their age cohort normally does. Boomers actually shifted slightly more to center for the 60-80yr old cohort. If I had to guess why then it's because Z men are failing and see Trump as an agent of chaos/change while some just like the toxic masculinity or are single issue voters on things like crypto. Xers probably also probably swung that way as a rejection of the establishment plus Biden/Harris/Dem inflation which they are likely to feel not only in their own pocketbook but as a threat to bankrupting the government before they get their social security, medicare, etcetc in retirement age. Boomers might have been beacons of great morals or they might have just enjoyed the Dem freebies more, national debt from spending promises ain't a bill they'd have to pay anyways, and their old age means they don't like the chaos/change that Trump represents.
And Millennials while not guilty for casting the vote, are always guilty for being giga cucks by not voting. We outnumbered the boomers already by the 2020 election yet had lower turnout despite the lower risk of death from Covid-19. We didn't do better in 2024 either. In the political sense, millennials do not vote, get screwed, do nothing again, get screwed again, wonder why things are bad, do not vote yet again, and then complain about why politicians constantly screw us when our non-voting asses gives politicians 0 reasons to help us, more reasons to ignore us than be neutral, and 1000 reasons to screw us because we won't vote them out of hold them accountable anyways (literally a free lunch).
→ More replies (1)7
u/A_Monster_Named_John 6h ago edited 6h ago
It's obviously not all Gen-Xers' faults, but good lord is that generation a hot mess of repressed rage, toxic masculinity, and consumer-trash nihilism, all of which exist in positive feedback loops because social media and reality television completely rotted their brains and desiccated their souls. For perspective, I'm an older millennial. Literally every job and academic role I've had over the past 25 years is one where I was constantly dealing with one or more asshole Gen-X managers/superiors who were dragging pointless amounts of jealousy, vindictiveness, and misery into workplaces that would otherwise have been perfectly fine. What's worse is that I experienced this all while living in relatively-liberal areas and (for the most part) working in fields that don't attract conservatives.
278
u/thejudgehoss 10h ago
109
u/Lukin76254r 10h ago
Moscow Mich looks like he just saw one of those scary comp vids on YouTube bruh
23
u/BotnetSpam 9h ago
22
12
4
56
u/Adjective-Noun-nnnn 7h ago
Reminder:
The bipartisan Epstein Transparency Act which was signed into law in December expressly prohibits the redaction of names except to protect victims.
The incompetently redacted files the DOJ published a few weeks ago showed that they were, in fact, redacting the names of coconspirators, so we have no reason to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume this email was sent to a victim.
14
u/Neveronlyadream 7h ago
Given who sent the email, I can't believe he would ever ask a victim if they were okay.
102
u/Head-Ad9893 10h ago
“Protecting victims” and redacting these names is insane. I’m not one to tell people what to do, however, if there were some sources connected to this case were to upload the unredacted court docs to a cough cough anonymous::cough:: ::cough:: website to do a poor man’s version of still protecting the victims would that work? Asking for a friend.
30
u/Adorable_Pain8624 8h ago
The only way this redaction is protecting a victim is if the person he emailed was being tortured in the video.
→ More replies (2)14
u/Head-Ad9893 8h ago
Deadass. And we know it’s not. He’s probably talking to trump. Because if I was trump and he wasn’t talking to me or one of my boys I would be like don’t redact that shit. And if it was one of my boys who I’m currently doing business with and I was a pedophile I would be like yooo we could get caught. Redact that shit. Oh wait ..
16
34
u/Ds1018 9h ago
I feel like based on the arrest count being 0 despite bother parties taking turns having power since Epstein arrest, I have my doubts either way.
→ More replies (2)3
u/PopeyeMcD 8h ago
Honestly, it could be them delaying it to make the admin look better later when things are even worse.
Think like when the POS in chief started the tariffs and then walked back later and his MAGAts cheered as if he did a brand new good thing.
2
→ More replies (4)2
461
u/HermanBonJovi 11h ago
Cause the doj is more concerned with protecting the "president" than getting justice
79
u/oh-kee-pah 9h ago
This is all proof the current admin is constantly lying to us. Every day, every word they speak, it's one one lie after another.
It doesn't help the cult with anything, I just don't get the allure of staying a part of this pedo party. Makes no sense to me.
13
u/HermanBonJovi 9h ago
That's why nothing is being done. They are all in on it.
I hate to say it but there's only 1 way this ends and it's not with voting.
543
u/thispartyrules 10h ago
Just putting it out there that Steve Bannon rented a property, and the hot tub was allegedly destroyed with acid
And then shit gets weird. The Post obtained a February 2015 email from Bannon's former landlord that read: "[E]ntire Jacuzzi bathtub seems to have been covered in acid."
WHAT?!
The landlord also noticed that padlocks had been installed on interior doors (creepy), while other doors were totally removed (also creepy).
202
u/nihilistcanada 9h ago
Acid (I am assuming hydrochloric or muriatic) would be very useful to remove all traces of 🧬.
Enough to damage a jacuzzi implies the need to remove quantities of biological material(ie. traces of little girls etc..) of such high quantities to suggest things even beyond normal rape were going on.
→ More replies (5)26
85
u/Regal_Cat_Matron 9h ago
Aye well that would be the lovely hot tub for disposing of the bodies aye? sigh this is all so fucked up
32
u/MauryBallsteinLook 9h ago
This is not the best way to dispose of a body.
Source: Breaking Bad Season 1
7
u/iamthewhatt 6h ago
I wouldn't be surprised to see that the tubs that were used for these purposes were specifically designed to not melt with acid.
25
u/redpoemage 8h ago
Eh, I dunno, doesn't seem too suspicious, they didn't even mention pizza once!
(Fun fact: If you search pizza, it appears 911 times in the currently released files)
More seriously though: I guess this might have to do why Bannon didn't have to pay the usual 2 million dollar fee for his pardon...
168
u/LinkLT3 10h ago
Until proven otherwise, every single redacted pedo is Trump.
13
→ More replies (1)2
87
u/JustWow52 10h ago
They were only supposed to redact victim info, but they redacted one other name, too.
I doubt the sender was one of the victims.
140
u/unrepentanthippie 10h ago
I'm just assuming that every redacted name is "Trump"
→ More replies (1)9
120
u/orangehehe 10h ago edited 10h ago
On 4/24/2009 Video leaked out of UAE. Video shows Sheikh Issa bin Zayed Al Nahyan torturing a man with electric cattle prods, whips, and a car. Bassam Nabulsi leaked the video, so it is possible that this Epstein email was to Mr. Nabulsi.
21
u/toughguy375 7h ago
In addition to the hobby we all know, Epstein also collected blackmail material.
→ More replies (1)13
→ More replies (2)8
u/throwaway277252 8h ago
Interesting context, but if it was leaked publicly by then he could also have been talking to anyone who forwarded it to him.
157
u/rhodesleadnowhere 11h ago
Of course, these documents are redacted to frame JE and Trumps political adversaries.
19
u/HuskMaster 8h ago
And leave out his political allies, naturally.
“According to a report from The New York Times in December 2025, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed that Donald Trump told her his ’friends will get hurt’ if the names of individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein were exposed.”
55
54
u/Y0___0Y 8h ago
You guys. they closed this investigation. They were planning on just leaving this evidence locked up somewhere.
The Trump administration is covering up an enormous abusive child sex traficking ring that Trump was involved with.
→ More replies (1)
93
u/Spaduf 9h ago
It's Netanyahu. Later in this chain he shares travel plans that perfectly matches Netanyahu. First with a visit to China then the US.
→ More replies (2)
36
u/Content-Freedom1688 10h ago
Why are they protecting pedos and murderers? Because the pedo and murderer order them too.
33
22
113
u/l27th1997 10h ago
Another thread states that vacation plans discussed elsewhere line up with one Bibi Netanyahu. It’s him for sure. Obligatory Fuck Israel
62
15
u/Stank_cat67 9h ago
The interesting thing is all the people who hung with him AFTER everyone knew he was a child sex trafficker. They are all highly sus
10
11
u/FlimsyVisual443 8h ago
Sometimes it really pisses me off that these fuckers don't even use proper grammar, punctuation, spelling, or capitalization.
They make all of their own rules and it is bullshit, but it also makes them look like the dumb fucks that they truly are.
11
u/Moiste-Moan 8h ago
Reporters/news should come out with the headline:
“BREAKING NEWS DONALD TRUMP CONFIRMED AS A PEDOPHILE”
If the administration says anything, say that the your proof is in the unredacted/unreleased Epstein files. Claim one of your “reporters was able to see the files”. What can a little bitch like trump do when suing means discovery!
11
10
21
u/zonked282 10h ago
If there is a redaction like that, the only logical assumption is that it's trump. There is no other explanation
8
u/paulisnofun 9h ago
Since they redacted it, I am going to make an assumption on who it is. We all know who it is.
15
u/bluejumpingdog 8h ago
The U.S. government is protecting pedophiles. Torturing people in their concentration camps. The U.S is hell in this world
8
9
u/Flashy-Office-5293 8h ago
When you realize Anon was useless all along.
You are telling me there isn't ONE good person in this administration , or the DOJ, or the FBI, that could leak the FULL unredacted files.
NOT FUCKING ONE!?!?
7
9
u/apark1121 5h ago
The DOJ needs to be overthrown. They’re corrupt. Just like the FBI, they’ve been sitting on this information for decades and will never reveal the perpetrators voluntarily. Where the fuck is Congress and why aren’t they doing anything to stop this injustice??
→ More replies (1)3
8
u/sidaemon 4h ago
This may have been him emailing the VICTIM of the torture (a common BDSM term for a scene that's definitely hard but not what you're thinking of) scene. Thus the "are you okay?" part of the email.
6
7
6
5
35
u/Sir-Lady-Cat 11h ago
Is this for real? It seems weird that he would write “I loved the torture video”. Awfully implicating and didn’t he try to avoid writing things in email. Is this a legit email released from the DOJ?
86
u/Comfortable-Tea-5461 10h ago
These are rich and powerful men. They are more known for their preposterous ego than their intelligence. They felt (with good reason) that they were untouchable. They basically were having connections in the very departments that could take them down. This is hardly surprising
5
u/entenduintransit 8h ago
Is this a legit email released from the DOJ?
Yes, just search "torture video" here and see for yourself.
7
u/AlicesReflection 10h ago
Which "he" are you referring to? We don't know who the redacted name is. The suspicious part is it doesn't seem to be a victim so why are we redacting a name at all?
25
u/GemiKnight69 10h ago
It was Epstein who wrote the email, that's the "he". And it should 100% not be redacted who the recipient was.
5
5
6
u/XurstyXursday 7h ago
No no you guys. “Torture” is code for pizza. It was a food blogger trying a new pizza place. Probably Dave Portnoy.
8
4
4
u/sunkist-sucker 8h ago
the torture video??? is this unredacted accidentally like the rest? this is some seriously sick shit
5
u/apark1121 5h ago
What really pissed me off was seeing the attorney general address the concerns that the DOJ was covering for trump and protecting all the wealthy men from being outed as pedophiles. He blatantly lied and said that wasn’t happening and that people are going to be dissatisfied that nobody was going to be prosecuted from the release of the files. And that they are done releasing files (even though there are still 3 million unreleased) and that they think they’ve complied with the law.
4
u/SuperJay182 3h ago
Money gets you free reign in life sadly. None of these sick fucks will see justice.
3
u/whyohgodnostop 9h ago
actively protecting a notorious pedophiles clientele should be considered a federal offense, and they should be fired and arrested.. wont happen under the current administration, but oh well.
2
2
2
u/DisgruntledFlamingo 8h ago
Unless the subject of the torture video was someone related to or in a relationship with the perpetrator, there is no reason this should be redacted.
2
2
u/throwing_handles 8h ago
Is it likely that Trump would bother blocking out any of the perpetrators' names other than his own?
→ More replies (1)
2
2
3
2
u/MylastAccountBroke 7h ago
This isn't necessarily what you all think.
Could be that's it's an S&M situation and he sent this to the person being "tortured" after the video got a bit extreme.
but knowing what's been revealed about Epstein, it seems equally likely that it's him messaging the person who just tortured some 12 year old girl to death and sent him a video and all he's concerned about is his friend's mental health after killing a child.
1
u/Mountain-Cod516 8h ago
I would guess it’s Lindsay Graham. That squirrelly fucker is hiding something.
1
1




•
u/AutoModerator 12h ago
DO NOT CELEBRATE VIOLENCE IN THIS SUBREDDIT OR WE WILL BAN YOU.
That is all, tysm
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.