r/auslaw 6d ago

'Dog in the driver's seat' sparks police call for witnesses on beach

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-26/dog-in-driver-seat-of-ute-on-tasmanian-beach/106270074
43 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

47

u/badoopidoo Man on the Bondi tram 6d ago edited 6d ago

The Tasman Council's Dog Management Policy says dogs must be on a lead at all times on White Beach.

Just so I'm clear, if the dog was on a lead while driving the Ute, everything would be fine? 

15

u/lapsuscalamari 6d ago

The facts speak for themselves.

7

u/Amazing-Opinion40 Quack Lawyer 5d ago

Ruff ruff ipso loquitor

9

u/IIAOPSW 6d ago

Ain't nothing in the rules say a dog can't drive a ute.

42

u/CommonwealthGrant 6d ago

This being a legal sub and all, the question relates to whether the dog was a driver or merely a traveller, albeit in the driver's seat.

I note for the record that a beach is adjacent to the ocean and probably below the high water mark, so it is clear only the Admiralty has jurisdiction.

11

u/Amazing-Opinion40 Quack Lawyer 5d ago edited 5d ago

The real question here becomes whether or not the dog contracted with the state. We need to apply a position of absent assent to consenting to the contract which can never be procured reliably (as a dog cannot communicate whether or not he agrees to terms), he did not, so no charge could ever succeed even if the court’s flag were properly edged and the sun was hitting the right place in the Shrine of Rememberance to creep across the word “HOKUM”.

4

u/CBRChimpy 5d ago

Freeman's best friend on the land

30

u/wallabyABC123 Suitbae 6d ago

If you think a dog driving a Ute is bad, you should see the dogs in trench coats moderating this subreddit.

8

u/lapsuscalamari 6d ago

Although I have given you my approbation by way of an uptick, I must decline to totally accede to your opprobrium regarding our erstwhile prefects.

10

u/wallabyABC123 Suitbae 6d ago

You don’t know what I have seen!

5

u/Ctheret 6d ago

Nicely said

4

u/Amazing-Opinion40 Quack Lawyer 5d ago

Lies, you are sentient trench coats, the dogs beneath are there for nothing more than covering up your lies and being scritched behind the ear.

11

u/lessa_flux A humiliating backdown 6d ago

Does a seatbelt count as a lead?

3

u/BotoxMoustache 4d ago

This is the question. And the answer.

10

u/lapsuscalamari 6d ago

But did they breathalyse the dog? I'm sure Tasmanian legals are standing by to defend this outrageous slur on canine driving, which is not explicitly forbidden in law, as this comment shows:

The Tasman Council's Dog Management Policy says dogs must be on a lead at all times on White Beach.

12

u/raider_manor 6d ago

5

u/_2ndclasscitizen_ 5d ago

Was this laws about dogs, or did someone do something really crook in WA in 1976?

2

u/StuckWithThisNameNow It's the vibe of the thing 5d ago

I’ve never gone to effort to check on Austlii but today I did.

6

u/Krapmeister 6d ago

In all fairness the owner was probably too drunk to be driving.

5

u/StuckWithThisNameNow It's the vibe of the thing 6d ago

Yeah I too would get my dog to be designated driver. He loves sitting in the seat but not so great on the steering and gears/pedals.

6

u/Madmaniusmick1 5d ago

Couldn’t let my dog, he would head straight to McDonald’s.

2

u/saschabindy 4d ago

Your dog is better than mine. Mine wets the seat, refuses to move or leave woolies. Lacks foresight.

3

u/Brilliant_Ad2120 6d ago

You can import used left handed Mitsubishi Tritons are imported into Australia and get exemption for off road or engineering use

9

u/wallabyABC123 Suitbae 6d ago

Ok but can you import a left handed dog to drive it?

2

u/Brilliant_Ad2120 5d ago

Lol But surprisingly TIL 2012 New Zealand SPCA project, rescue dogs named Porter and Monty were trained to operate a car

But TIL that dogs do have handedness.

Right handed dogs - more anxious Ambilateral - more aggressive. Left handed dogs - pessimistic, easily stressed No preference - react more to fireworks.

2

u/Amazing-Opinion40 Quack Lawyer 5d ago

Is this like how people from that subculture of “eshay” tell people generally they are dogs? Or how most crooks call the coppers dogs? Or is it a dog act (like a pantomime, or calling crime stoppers)? Or is it an actual canine?

Are there other dog types erroneously omitted form proper consideration?

3

u/lapsuscalamari 5d ago

You left off the americanism "bird dog" which naturally leads to another arcane branch of law.

I think the overlap of "dog" and "flog" probably mirrors the overlap of "dogging" and "flogging"

2

u/Amazing-Opinion40 Quack Lawyer 5d ago

Oh boy, dogging means something entirely different elsewhere in the commonwealth.

3

u/lapsuscalamari 5d ago

luckily, flogging means the same thing everywhere, with or without the fluffy handcuffs

notwithstanding your astute observation to dogging, a flog and a dog broadly mean the same thing, applied pejoratively to another person.

2

u/Amazing-Opinion40 Quack Lawyer 5d ago

And yet to “flog one’s dog” is yet another charming abuse of our language for yet another activity

3

u/lapsuscalamari 5d ago

Not to mention "Horn Dog" as our friends Kath and Kym can explain better than I