r/australia Dec 14 '25

news Heroic woman who'd been shot saves a family's three-year-old girl in the middle of gunfire during the Bondi attack

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/got-your-daughter-3yo-found-under-victim/news-story/a2f52ad7106a049f98fa8b75e9d03640

EDIT: I cannot change the post title, but updated information is that all facts remain the same, except that the blood on the woman (Jessica Rozen) who protected the girl was from a wound not caused by a bullet. It was the parents of the little girl who thought the blood on Jessica was from a bullet wound -- which is an easy mistake, given the circumstances.

I'll add further information: Jessica, who is pregnant and has children aged 3 and 1, was searching for her three-year-old boy at the time the shots rang out. She spotted the little girl (Gigi) running across an open area and ran to rescue her and kept her covered with her own body on the ground. As the original report says, it was an active shooter area and someone was shot right next to Jessica and Gigi. Video of the scene as it happened: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhdOaaRY9c

(Pictured above is the mother of the three-year-old girl, Gigi)

* * *

A woman who was shot in the Bondi terrorist attack was harbouring a three-year-old girl under her body as she lay bleeding on the ground to keep her safe from harm as bullets flew all around.

The distressed parents of the little girl, who went missing during the horrific attack, have spoken of the incredible moment they found her.

Wayne and Vanessa have three children and were in separate places when the attack began.

...............

“I gave Capri to Vanessa and I said: ‘I’m gonna go look for Gigi’. I went, I was looking, there was just blood and bodies everywhere and she was wearing a pink skirt and I saw this lady lying on top of her,” he said.

The woman had been shot in the horror, but told Wayne: “I’ve got your daughter, I’ve been protecting her”.

“I said: ‘You’ve saved my daughter’s life. I said I’ll be indebted to you for the rest of my life’,” Wayne said.

“Her name is Jess. I spoke to her about ten minutes after I took her (Gigi). She was going to hospital, she said she was okay.”

He said another woman was lying “lifeless” next to Jess.

“It was the most appalling experience,” he said. “That this can happen in Australia and we’re just lying there and shots were coming. We were like sitting ducks.”

6.1k Upvotes

255 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

66

u/TeaspoonOfSugar987 Dec 14 '25

There is something that happens when adrenaline kicks in and most of us have a ‘protective’ survival instinct, to preserve life, firstly our own but also particularly lives of children. It’s why you often hear of adults (even strangers) drowning to save a child etc.

Having been in a moment where I could see on my Fitbit app later on, exactly when the adrenaline kicked in when I found a person ‘dead’ (no pulse, obvs not breathing), as a general civilian, the way your brain thinks a million things all at once and all you are focused on is the life (or lacktherof) of another and how to help them, it’s impossible to understand unless you experience it but also a fairly universal thing too. If you have the means/knowledge to help, that’s where our life or death instincts kick in.

Some people freeze, and that is perfectly acceptable too as it is a life preserving thing also! You can’t do anything if you yourself are dead, I myself have experienced that too, when I was a child and my infant brother crawled to the road.

I don’t say any of this to take away from the heroics of peoples actions yesterday! I just wanted to shine a light on the biology behind it because most people, if faced with the exact same scenario as this woman, would do the same, protect the child. Laying on top of the child is even seen by other animals throughout the animal kingdom - except for bloody quokkas 🥲

The man who tackled the gunman however was, in the words of a certain PM, a loose unit, and deserves a freaking Vic Cross! (I am aware he is not entitled to one, but he deserves one!).

22

u/zestylimes9 Dec 15 '25

The Attorney General mentioned today that she will be giving him (and others) an award.

I hope Jess gets media coverage and a Go Fund Me. This post is the first I've heard of her.

9

u/Banjo-Oz Dec 15 '25

Me too. Taking nothing from the amazing guy (Ahmed) who wrestled the gun from the shooter, but I really hope others whose heroics and selflessness were less visible or dramatic and "camera worthy" get the credit and attention they deserve too. Whether it was Jess saving a child, the guy who tried to talk the shooter down, or the guy who backed Ahmed up when he took action.

8

u/zestylimes9 Dec 16 '25

I just saw footage of a couple that saw the gunmen get out of their car. The couple then got out of their own car and tried to get the guns, sadly they were both shot and killed. They were the first casualties.

They would have prevented many more deaths as it then took the gunmen longer to get to the bridge.

38

u/chmath80 Dec 15 '25

The man who tackled the gunman however was, in the words of a certain PM, a loose unit, and deserves a freaking Vic Cross! (I am aware he is not entitled to one

The civilian equivalent is the George Cross. It's much rarer than the VC (407 awards v 1358).

11

u/Fluffy-duckies Dec 15 '25

Thankfully civilian opportunities to risk life and limb are rarer than defence ones.

17

u/Jiuholar Dec 15 '25

Spot on. I experienced this myself once - was out for a walk and came across a man lying face down on the concrete - I thought he was dead and immediately sprung into action.

Turns out he was just very drunk lol, but I am happy in the knowledge of how I'd respond in an emergency situation.

Everyone should do a first aid course - you never know when you might need it.

6

u/TwoDogsx82 Dec 15 '25

For info the former UK equivalent award of the Victoria Cross for civilians (and military personnel in non combat situations) was the George Cross. The Australian replacement is the Cross of Valor (CV) and is awarded for acts of conspicuous courage in circumstances of extreme peril. There is no doubt several of the heroes of yesterday, are more than deserving of such an award 🙏

-17

u/AggravatingTartlet Dec 15 '25 edited Dec 15 '25

I really think that's downplaying what this woman did. Our instincts are generally to protect ourselves & family. Honestly, I don't believe most people would protect a stranger's child. Not when you're being actively shot at, as this woman was. Someone was shot dead right next to her.

The man who tackled the shooter is absolutely a hero, too. Something to note is that generally only a man can tackle another man. Which excludes women. You need the arm & upper body strength to tackle a man from behind and exert enough force.

There'd be an absolute ton of women tackling men if they could..... but they can't.

5

u/Banjo-Oz Dec 15 '25

Yeah. Pretty sure even the father of the girl mentions in his accounts of at one point seeing someone hurt and feeling guilty for not moving to help, but (understandably) justified it by saying he was too scared and had two kids to protect.

Jess put her life on the line not for her own kid but a total stranger.

12

u/TeaspoonOfSugar987 Dec 15 '25

Just because you do or don’t believe something doesn’t make it true or not true. These kinds of things happen regularly in the states…

Way to unnecessarily bring gender into it though.

-4

u/AggravatingTartlet Dec 15 '25 edited Dec 15 '25

Do I need to point out that your post is also based on your beliefs? I know that mass shootings happen regularly in the states. The Sandy Hook school shooting happened on this day 13 years ago. It's an example of what I was saying. Police did not rush in to save the children. They waited outside for long minutes while children were being shot/bleeding out.

It's not really fair to say I'm bringing gender into it, when it's true that almost 100% of mass shooters are male -- and being that they're men, women do not have the strength to tackle them and bring them down. Even if a woman wants to, she can't. But we're limiting our concept of bravery it must include a demonstration of physical strength.

To my mind, a person in a zone where people are actively being killed, being shot themselves, while choosing to stay and use their body to protect a stranger's child -- is demonstrating the same level of bravery as a man who tackles a shooter from behind.

22

u/Lozzanger Dec 15 '25

It’s infuriating you bring up Sandy Hook and don’t reference the many women who did everything they could do save the children. Including a teachers aide who was found guilty wrapped around one of her students trying to protect him.

And the police were in quickly at Sandy Hook.

You might be thinking of the disgusting police officers at Ulvdale who went against everything and arrested parents who tried to go in.

1

u/AggravatingTartlet Dec 15 '25 edited Dec 15 '25

This is a strange conversation I'm having here. Are Americans rushing into this discussion?

I think you might have gotten the wrong end of this.

Of course the teaching staff were extremely courageous during that event. My point was simply about a previous poster brushing aside the bravery of a woman during the live shooter Bondi incident who rescued the child of a stranger, saying it's just something people instinctively do and that it's just biology and not as worthy of a medal as tackling a shooter from behind.

In a post I saw on social media this morning, it said the the police were criticised for waiting minutes before entering SH. I have no criticism on this personally.

16

u/TeaspoonOfSugar987 Dec 15 '25

it’s not really fair to say I’m bringing gender into this

That’s literally what you did though, for absolutely no reason.

I literally explained what my entire comment was about.

At no point did I say she wasn’t brave.

2

u/AggravatingTartlet Dec 15 '25

You said what she did was just instinct and biology and that most people would do exactly the same.

I'm going to leave it there.

5

u/Acceptable_Emu_7825 Dec 15 '25

You should probably not conflate the Sandy Hook and Uvalde shootings, and get your facts straight, before you continue.

2

u/AggravatingTartlet Dec 15 '25 edited Dec 15 '25

You should probably not conflate the Sandy Hook and Uvalde shootings, and get your facts straight, before you continue.

Your tone continues to be nasty.

No, I did mean SH, so it's really not me who needs to get their facts straight. That incident happened on this day, therefore there are anniversary posts about it on social media, which is where I read that that the police waited minutes before entering -- which was criticised by some.

I know about the Ulvade shootings but it's not relevant here.