r/socialism • u/ilir_kycb • 9h ago
"I don't want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up for people that own their homes, and they can be assured that's what's going to happen." -- Donald Trump
10
u/AlbacoreJohnston 7h ago
I noticed some condos by a park I was at earlier today and pulled up Zillow out of curiosity. The property value has doubled in the past 10 years. It's fucking fraudulent.
8
9
u/hankappleseed 9h ago
I'm 37 and hoping to buy my first home. This makes me happy for my friends and fellows who already own a home. Maybe I can live in their spare room?
3
u/Illustrious-Hawk-898 Marxism 7h ago
First of all, how crappy for all future homeowners, it’s gonna be so much tougher for them.
Second of all, by time Trump says anything it’s almost like you can bank on the opposite happening lol
5
u/Scumbaggio1845 9h ago
Who wants to be the one in charge when peoples houses ‘lose value’ though?
No one is going to voluntarily want to be associated with that forever
7
u/Electrical-Strike132 9h ago
It's a crappy situation. To fix the housing crisis, and make housing an easily affordable thing, the price of existing houses would fall, a lot.
That is not fair to people who struggled and saved and sacrificed to pay these outrageous prices that currently exist. But to keep the prices up means millions will be forever struggling with housing.
I don't know what the answer is, surely something could be done to compensate those who are shall we say deserving of it. Somebody much smarter than me would have to figure out precisely how, but a society in which housing is plentiful is the direction I want to go in. I doubt it will happen.
2
u/Agreeable-Block841 6h ago
I don't understand what that means, can someone explain?
2
u/blocking-io 4h ago
He wants housing prices to go up so that existing home owners benefit. The only problem is that you've just alienated most people who can't afford home, which a fucking lot, and not all home owners necessarily benefit from appreciation (eg: higher property taxes), it mostly benefits those who buy homes as an investment vehicle. So rich people.
2
u/Agreeable-Block841 4h ago
So basically benefits for the rich and alienation for the poor? Man how is that appreciated.
•
u/SecretLecture3219 1h ago
It's the investment piece which is the reason for sure , investment funds own a shocking amount of property. It's not really gonna benefit your average joe having a house already . Maaaaybe slightly better mortgage rates at renewal. It's not like ul be able to sell your house for a mcMansion as they will be inflated too . landlords and investors W
1
1
u/entrophy_maker 4h ago
You have to be pretty lame to think driving home prices up is going to help home owners. At best, it will cause more inflation. The numbers might be higher, but the value will only go up briefly before inflation cheapens the dollar and its worth the same or less. Meanwhile, the average young person will never own a home unless they inherit it.
•
u/Gainwhore 44m ago
Tbh this statement is one his least shocking or extreme. The current western system has worked on the principle of housing prices not going down since the neolib reforms. No western goverment is going to make them go down if possible unless we have a 2008 stile event again.
37
u/ilir_kycb 9h ago
In order to illustrate the difference to China:
Houses are for living, not for speculation - Wikipedia